This REX Shares screen is useful because the group is small enough to see the tradeoffs clearly. I am not trying to pick a winner here. I am trying to understand which funds look like aggressive income trades and which ones have a cleaner balance between payout, price trend, and total return.
The current list includes AIPI, FEPI, PAAU, TSII, and WMTI.
Some rows are incomplete where the visible snapshot did not include enough data. Those values are shown as N/A.
| Fund Ticker | Dividend TTM | Price CAGR | Total Return CAGR | Payout Support Risk | Stability | Dividend TTM (MoM) | Price Growth (MoM) | Total Return CAGR (MoM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIPI | 39.88% | -16.78% | 7.85% | Elevated | LOW | 42.49% (-2.61pp) | -20.15% (+3.37pp) | N/A |
| FEPI | 26.52% | -6.89% | 9.36% | Elevated | LOW | 28.60% (-2.08pp) | -10.16% (+3.27pp) | N/A |
| PAAU | N/A | N/A | -13.33% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TSII | 65.79% | -27.57% | -2.32% | Elevated | LOW | 58.21% (+7.58pp) | -25.79% (-1.78pp) | N/A |
| WMTI | 13.07% | 23.15% | 6.14% | Low | LOW | 11.84% (+1.23pp) | 13.58% (+9.57pp) | N/A |
What I noticed
TSII has the highest Dividend TTM in this group at 65.79%, but Price CAGR is -27.57% and Total Return CAGR is -2.32%. Payout support risk is also marked Elevated. That combination tells me the payout number needs to be read together with price erosion, not separately.
AIPI and FEPI are both marked Elevated, but the magnitude is different. AIPI has 39.88% Dividend TTM with -16.78% Price CAGR and 7.85% Total Return CAGR. FEPI has 26.52% Dividend TTM with -6.89% Price CAGR and 9.36% Total Return CAGR. Both are income-heavy, but FEPI shows less negative price movement in this snapshot.
WMTI is the row that looks different. Its Dividend TTM is lower at 13.07%, but Price CAGR is 23.15%, Total Return CAGR is 6.14%, and payout support risk is marked Low. That does not make it a recommendation, but it changes the screening question: lower payout, cleaner price behavior.
PAAU is incomplete in this snapshot. It only shows -13.33% Total Return CAGR, with the other key fields marked N/A, so I would not compare it directly against the complete rows yet.
My takeaway from this group is that the highest payout row is not automatically the most useful row. For my own screening, I would separate “maximum income” from “income with less obvious price damage” before deciding whether any of these deserve a role.
Note: Metrics are exported from Dividend Decoder as a partial snapshot; not investment advice.